Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:13:46 +0100
with message-id <20120322141343.ga24...@crater2.logilab.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#665092: libpcre3: libpcre.so.3 file missing
has caused the Debian Bug report #665092,
regarding libpcre3: libpcre.so.3 file missing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
665092: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665092
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libpcre3
Version: 8.30-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

It looks like there is some error in the name and/or version of .so files and 
links


Found:
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.2.13.1
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.2

Expected:
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3.30.1
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3


For now, reversing to testing 8.12-1 fixes the problem.

Thanks for your work,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libpcre3 depends on:
ii  libc6              2.13-27
ii  multiarch-support  2.13-27

libpcre3 recommends no packages.

libpcre3 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 13:20:31 +0100, fgivors wrote:

> Package: libpcre3
> Version: 8.30-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> It looks like there is some error in the name and/or version of .so files and 
> links
> 
dupe of #664983, #664991, closing.

Cheers,
Julien


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to