ah -- and found that you adopted it already: https://github.com/statsmodels/statsmodels/issues/109 https://github.com/statsmodels/statsmodels/commit/590bd6238d7d2538a557ce664ee90f4b9116449c
cool -- thanks ;) On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > d'oh forgotten about it -- thanks Gregor > pystatsmodels people -- would you like to adopt this patch: > +--- > statsmodels-0.3.1.orig/scikits/statsmodels/discrete/tests/test_discrete.py > 2011-11-15 09:57:09.346314408 -0500 > ++++ statsmodels-0.3.1/scikits/statsmodels/discrete/tests/test_discrete.py > 2011-11-15 10:01:45.998317336 -0500 > +@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ > + res2.probit() > + cls.res2 = res2 > + cls.res1 = Probit(data.endog, data.exog).fit(method="cg", > +- disp=0, maxiter=250) > ++ disp=0, maxiter=500) > + > + class TestProbitNCG(CheckModelResults): > + @classmethod > as a fixup for occasional unittest failures due to precision? > meanwhile I will feed it into Debian package of 0.3.1 > Cheers > On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:57:37 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > > Source: statsmodels > > > Version: 0.3.1-3 > > > Severity: serious > > > Justification: fails to build from source > > Ubuntu has a patch at > > http://patches.ubuntu.com/s/statsmodels/statsmodels_0.3.1-3ubuntu1.patch > > not sure if this is a good and/or future-proof idea ... > > Cheers, > > gregor -- =------------------------------------------------------------------= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
