On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:22:20 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:13:30 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > > I'd like to bring few more arguments to consideration. > > And we should finally resolve this question :) > > > I forgot to CC to David Paleino when I posted my idea of wrapper script so > > I wrote to him and he replied with another good argument: > > > I think that, while the wrapper script is a good technical solution, > > > it'll vastly reduce the usefulness of the package, and it will diverge it > > > from what upstream distributes. This way we introduce a delta between > > > Debian (and its derivatives) and all other *nix distributions with that > > > package. We can consider this important or not, but we should take it into > > > consideration IMVHO. > > The same is true for libmysql-diff-perl :)
Well, yes. But a mysqldiff provided by Oracle sounds a bit more "official" than anything else :) But I'm happy we found a possible solution... > Anyway, I'm fine with renaming "our" mysqldiff to something else, my > current favourite being mysqlschemadiff. Comments? ...that would be perfect for me. Dmitry? Thanks Gregor for your comments! David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature