Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:10:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line new release
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 23:26:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 16:26:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shadowland.snow-crash.org (ned.snow-crash.org) [80.190.250.253]
(postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EG386-0003DA-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:26:58 -0700
Received: from nahar.localdomain (p83.129.19.128.tisdip.tiscali.de
[83.129.19.128])
by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D9E335A3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:26:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=nahar.localdomain)
by nahar.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
id 1EG37x-0006AS-5G
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:26:49 +0200
From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned?
Organization: CPU+Mainboard-FAQ: http://www.dch-faq.de/
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:26:48 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: pspp
Version: 0.3.0-8
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should be either orphaned or removed completly from Debian
(unstable and testing) since they have been obviously neglected by their
maintainer.
Your package did show up on this list and we propose to orphan it. There
are not very many users, the last upload was two years ago and it's
rc-buggy.
This usually means that your package matched some of the following
criteria:
[1] Your packages has not had an upload for more than two years
[2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**)
[3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you
might be MIA
[4] (if we propose a removal) it shows in popcon as having less than
100 users with the package installed.
[5] the package was not released with sarge
and at least ([1] and ( [2] or [3] or [4] or [5] )) was true.
(**) The maintainer not answering to RC bugs refers to bugs filed
more than one month before the time the check was performed.
After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign
this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or
ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it).
The package will need an upload or an explanation for this action not to
proceed.
Please do *not* upload a package just to get off this list - it won't
help the package at all. Maintainers should be responsive and feel
responsible for their packages without needing other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
Marc
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328545-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 12:11:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 05:11:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.198.43]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERTpX-0004gs-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:11:03 -0700
Received: from vanzandt.comcast.net
(c-24-61-94-90.hsd1.nh.comcast.net[24.61.94.90](misconfigured sender))
by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP
id <2005101712103101400l9lqbe>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:10:31 +0000
Received: from jrv by vanzandt.comcast.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1ERTok-0006Ml-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:10:14 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new release
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "James R. Van Zandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:10:14 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
These were fixed in 0.4.0-1 - don't know why the bug system didn't see
the changelog entry.
pspp (0.4.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
* build against libplot2c2
-- James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:43:59 -0400
pspp (0.4.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* added libgsl0-dev to Build-Depends
-- James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 24 Sep 2005 21:38:10 -0400
pspp (0.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release (fixes: Bug#259615,Bug#328545)
* debian/control: update Debian policy version (no changes needed),
update program description, add libplot-dev to Build-Depends, bump
debhelper version to 4.0
* debian/watch: update format to version 3
* debian/rules: eliminate support for debian-test, install pspp-mode.el,
revert to Makefile commands to build .html documentation. Build and
install .pdf documentation. Register .html and .pdf files with
doc-base. Eliminate deprecated DH_COMPAT setting.
* debian/README: eliminate outdated material, add pointers on
documentation and the Emacs mode.
-- James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 24 Sep 2005 09:45:36 -0400
- Jim Van Zandt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
