Hi Roger, > On 22.04.2012 23:03, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > > On 22.04.2012 22:58, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > >> Subject: insserv: update-rc.d is a dangling symlink > >> Package: insserv > >> Version: 1.14.0-3 > > > > I forgot to add this info: > > > > heidi:/home/eddy# ls -l /usr/sbin/update-rc* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Sep 22 2009 /usr/sbin/update-rc.d -> > > /usr/sbin/update-rc.d-insserv > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 16894 Mar 13 09:14 /usr/sbin/update-rc.d.distrib > > heidi:/home/eddy# dpkg -S /usr/sbin/update-rc.d.distrib > > diversion by insserv from: /usr/sbin/update-rc.d > > diversion by insserv to: /usr/sbin/update-rc.d.distrib > > > > After trying to reinstall sysv-rc and insserv a few times to no avail, I > looked into sysv-rc's postinst and suspected the problem was that the > divert will be removed if only /var/run/sysv-rc.upgrade existed, so I > manually ran these commands
insserv (1.14.0-3) stopped shipping update-rc.d-insserv, since it was almost identical to the update-rc.d shipped by sysv-rc for quite some time now and the update-rc.d diversion should have been removed some time ago. Somehow Eddy's system still contained a diversion, could sysv-rc.postinst perhaps remove this diversion unconditionally? Or should insserv provide a postinst to do only that in your opinion? Thanks, Kel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
