On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:58:30 +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:26:17PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: > > Package: luajit > > Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 > > Severity: grave > > Tags: upstream > > > > In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, but > > rather > > be made available via backports. > > Sooo, how is ulatencyd affected? It just lists libluajit-5.1-dev as an > alternative build dependency of liblua5.1-0-dev (to let people rebuild the > packages with luajit support without problems) but does not actually use it. I > don't see this as a problem, am I wrong? > No, that looks fine.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
