(2012-07-24 02:30 +0000), Clint Adams wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:05:28AM +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote: >> Don't use "ghc-ghci" virtual-package-name on Build-Depends, >> because it has not been allowed yet by Debian-Policy >> to use the virtual-package-name of "ghc-ghci". > > How is this a FTBFS?
Of course, this bug must be FTBFS because the package which cannot exist according to the architecture is specified. In Debian, it is usual to not "any" but listed the architecture to build. But in order to detain the architecture which is not supporting ghci to the status of BD-Uninstallable, I was explained when it had become intentionally so by Haskell Policy. Regards, -- Hiroyuki Yamamoto A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
