Hi, I'm happy to make whatever changes are necessary to this package, but I'm not sure what is gained by providing Breaks for every potential package affected by a bouncycastle upgrade. It seems to me more proper that if package X depends on bouncycastle = version Y (which appears to be the case here) that package should then reflect it, rather than putting X number of Breaks in the bouncycastle package itself and having to expand that list each time a new package enters the pool that depends upon it.
Best regards, -Brian
