-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 10/12/2012 02:36 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + pending
>
> Dear Maintainers,
>
> Andreas Beckmann <deb...@abeckmann.de> writes:
>
>> Package: timidity-daemon Version: 2.13.2-40 Severity: serious
>> User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts
>>
>> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package mishandles
>> conffiles. This is violates the policy, see
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
>>
>>
>>
>>
I miserably failed to understand that the maintainer scripts were to do,
>> the only thing I can say for sure is that the conffile
>> /etc/init.d/timidity is removed during the remove step of the
>> package (which is wrong, because configuration must be preserved
>> after remove, and needs to be clened up during purge only.
>>
>> And that will fail in the following scenario:
>>
>> install timidity-daemon remove (don't purge!) timidity-daemon
>> install timidity-daemon
>>
>> Now /etc/init.d/timidity is missing (as dpkg will not restore
>> deleted configuration files as that is usually a user choice the
>> should be preserved).
>
> I have uploaded to DELAYED/2 a NMU of timidity versioned
> 2.13.2-40.1 which fixes that bug. The debdiff is attached. Don't
> hesitate to tell me if I should delay the upload longer.
Thank you for uploading a NMU.
> Guo: Thanks for your contribution. I did not directly upload your
> patch for two reasons. First it was buggy since it was removing
> the call to "invoke-rc.d timidity stop" in "prerm remove", and
> this call has to stay there.
OK, it indeed needs this. However, I found that dh_installinit already
provided this by default in prerm:
# Automatically added by dh_installinit
if [ -x "/etc/init.d/timidity" ] && [ "$1" = remove ]; then
invoke-rc.d timidity stop || exit $?
fi
# End automatically added section
> Second it was making unnecessary changes related to
> /etc/timidity/timidity.daemon, which is no longer shipped in the
> package (it seems to predate squeeze); NMUs have to change the
> minimal amount of code in order to fix the bug. But indeed, as
> Andreas has noted, a lot of obsolete stuff could probably be
> removed from the maintainer scripts.
I see that NMU prefer to be minimal. Maybe my patch will still be
useful in case of a maintainer upload.
Cheers,
Guo Yixuan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=p9pU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
