Hi Javier, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
> Thanks for the updated information. However, in the listing of > documents you indicate that some of the versions of the constitution > are still under the OPL license and, Yes, if I understand correctly then Raul Miller's text on the voting system used (including handling of supermajorities) was never explicitly licensed under a DFSG-free license. I do not see Raul on the list of people being contacted for http://bugs.debian.org/388141 --- I am not even sure if he had an alioth account --- and meanwhile I think it would be worthwhile to find his wishes to get the license of this foundational document clear. > in addition, in doc-debian we > have provide additional documentation (such as information about bug > handling, taken from http://www.debian.org/Bugs/) that seems to still > be OPL. I might have not looked carefully enough, but from a quick glance, that seemed to come from GPL-2 source (the documentation is maintained with the rest of the debbugs codebase). > I would rather wait for the copyright notice in each of these pages to > change before I change debian/copyright and update the status. Right > now all of them point to the boilerplate page > http://www.debian.org/license which still mentions that OPL is the > current license for all the documents previous to January 25th, 2012. > > Hopefully, when #388141 is resolved for all documents we will be > able to update debian/copyright and close this bug too. That's fine with me. I mostly meant to give a summary for Francesco of the current status of these documents. I also agree with you that the /licenses page online should be updated when their license status is clear, not just doc-debian's copyright file. Thanks for the quick feedback. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
