Dear Andreas,
I personally would be happy if you would decide for the later because
in addition you get a lot of other information and how people might
deal together with other problems.
After my answer yesterday I subscribed to the CamiTK package only, but
reading your answer, I just reconsidered and subscribed to debian-med
mailing-list as it seems the best option to improve my learning curve.
In this case would CamITK remain in *main*! Considering the fact that
you know all these facts - would you volunteer to do the needed steps?
I am on a tight schedule this week. Do you think it could be ok if:
- I remove the licence offending part of the CamiTK source for the
moment (the tetgen plugin) today
- I do a better work at the beginning of next week where I could
reintroduce the tetgen plugin but using the tetgen debian package
instead and correct the two other bugs properly (#689021 and 690830)
For #690830 there is a patch proposal and there is also a another way
that I would like to try first (that will probably have better compiler
specific/multi-arch support).
Thanks again, all your help is really appreciated.
--
Emmanuel Promayon
UJF-Grenoble 1, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 (équipe GMCAO)
Institut de l'Ingénierie de l'Information de Santé
Faculté de Médecine - 38706 La Tronche cedex - France
Tel. +33/0 456 52 00 03 - Fax. +33/0 456 52 00 55 - B7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
