Hi Daniel, Daniel Hartwig <mand...@gmail.com> skribis:
> If you have time, please briefly review my comments below, and whether > it is sane to also relax these tests in Debian's guile-1.6 package (see > attached). I will also be investigating this further to confirm that > guardians are working as expected with this version. Your analysis makes perfect sense to me. > commit e13f1cbdffa4f333d9866d1b22cd2c9a3b17b3bd > Author: Ludovic Courtes <ludovic.cour...@laas.fr> > Date: Sun Jun 25 22:43:20 2006 +0000 > > Fixed `guardians.test' so that it does not use symbols. In the context of 1.6/1.8, I’d first install the above patch and see whether it improves things. Then, if that’s not enough, you may indeed relax the tests to (throw 'unresolved). But make sure to do manual testing of guardians before you do. (The problem of these tests is that they rely on largely non-deterministic behavior, which is why I ended up relaxing them.) Thanks, Ludo’. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
