Hi, On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:37:54PM +0100, Dominik George wrote: > > Is there a particular use case for such support, other than > > "because we can"? If not, then not having multi-arch support in > > wheezy doesn't seem a huge issue; ymmv, obviously.
The package is more or less smartphone exclusive, so basically
only interesting for ARM. Multi-Arch is helpful for armel vs armhf
vs arm64. I don't think this is important for wheezy, though.
Even more interesting is support for crosscompilers etc., but
the fso/shr related packages do not yet enable M-A for the -dev
packages, so obviously it's also irrelevant for wheezy.
=> IMHO removing M-A is not a huge issue
> I can prepare another version for wheezy incorporating this.
preparing a upload for testing was what I indented to do, too.
I planed to check how to fix this without removing M-A support,
though. It should be possible to do something like this in the
postrm script:
if [ !package_is_still_installed_for_another_arch ] ; then
remove files
fi
> What about version numbering and such, now -2 has been uploaded?
It should be something like "-1+wheezy1". This makes the version
bigger than the one currently in wheezy, but smaller than the one
currently in unstable.
-- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
