Your message dated Thu, 28 Feb 2013 21:16:36 +0100
with message-id <20130228201636.gq5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#674156: glib2.0: GStaticMutex ABI change on armel,
armhf, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc and probably mips
has caused the Debian Bug report #674156,
regarding glib2.0: GStaticMutex ABI change on armel, armhf, mipsel, powerpc,
s390, sparc and probably mips
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
674156: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674156
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
Version: 0.10.31-2
Severity: important
Hi,
Currently ther are detection problems of gstreamer0.10-plugins-good's
rtpmp2tpay (which is provided by libgstrtp.so according to
gst-inspect-0.10) on most architectures. This breaks the build of
gnome-dvb-daemon:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnome-dvb-daemon
-- Sebastian
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:38:47 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 at 18:39:24 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > By making a sourceful upload
> > of gstreamer0.10, together with the sourceful upload of swami that has
> > already happened and a pile of 14 binNMUs (see 694525#59), we can get
> > full upgrades into a consistent state.
>
> Julien has NMU'd gstreamer0.10 and scheduled some binNMUs, and swami has
> migrated, so all we're waiting for to achieve this is for gstreamer0.10
> to migrate. (This can be tracked by waiting for #697025, which is also RC,
> to migrate.)
>
> So, assuming no serious problems with the NMU, it's only a matter of time
> before full upgrades are OK.
>
> Regarding the original bug, gnome-dvb-daemon was recently built on the
> affected architectures; it is now built on all Linux architectures.
> So, from that point of view, job done.
>
> As for partial upgrades: Julien's NMU of gstreamer0.10 bumped the shlibs,
> so if dependent packages are rebuilt (up to 22 source NMUs of Multi-arch: same
> packages, and up to 38 binNMUs of other packages,
> see http://bugs.debian.org/694525#59), certain broken combinations
> (namely: new dependent package, old gstreamer0.10) will be prevented.
> There hasn't been any systematic upload of these; it's an open question
> whether it's worthwhile to do all of these, or just the binNMUs, or neither.
>
> The other broken combination (new gstreamer0.10, old dependent package)
> can only be addressed via Breaks relations. I think Julien's conclusion
> was that this has an unacceptable risk of introducing weird upgrade bugs
> where apt fails to find a solution, similar to
> <http://bugs.debian.org/676485>?
>
Right. I think we can close the bug against glib now, as the ABI change
is not going to be reverted and we've (hopefully) done what we could to
minimize the damage it causes.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
