Your message dated Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:06:53 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Point to an actual bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2005 07:59:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 08 23:59:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp10.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.21]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZkrt-0006gd-00; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:59:42 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf1001.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B54DA18000BD
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:59:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-60-161.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr
[82.126.128.161])
by mwinf1001.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 924DD18000B9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:59:10 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sven by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EZkn0-0006k1-Dt; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:54:38 +0100
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:54:33 +0100
From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[email protected]
Subject: new kernel-package breaks official linux-2.6 kernel builds, should not
propagate to testing.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.008
Severity: grave
As discussed on irc, the new 10.008 kernel-package was prematurely uploaded to
unstable, and breaks linux-2.6 builds. The issues at hand are :
1. the missing config caues manuals not to build
2. the headers build binaries uneccessarily (but doesn't break build)
3. missing depends and recommends in the linux-image package.
These are probably due to a k-p regression, which means that both the config
for the arch-indep build and the control file provided by the linux-2.6 build
infrastructure are not used for the final packages, for some yet mysterious
reason.
This is being worked on, and hopefully a fix will be out soon, but in the
meantime, kernel-package 10.008 is useless for official linux-2.6 builds, and
since it is in unstable, means we cannot upload anymore linux-2.6 packages
until it is fixed, which makes this RC.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-powerpc
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages kernel-package depends on:
ii dpkg 1.10.28 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii dpkg-dev 1.10.28 Package building tools for Debian
ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:3.3.5-3 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.5-13 The GNU C compiler
ii make 3.80-9 The GNU version of the "make" util
ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338283-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2005 14:16:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 09 06:16:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net
(glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com) [12.107.230.171]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZqkf-0007DN-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 06:16:38 -0800
Received: from glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with
ESMTP id jA9E70Cw012170
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:07:01 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id
jA9E6via012167;
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:06:57 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com: srivasta set
sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Point to an actual bug
Organization: Manoj Srivastava's Home
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACYAAAAwCAMAAABKbPgaAAAAM1BMVEUAAADIjH/0rp1KPz79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X-URL: http://www.golden-gryphon.com/
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
X-Hashcash: 1:25:051109:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::J3E+iH/UJ9Sq0f34:0000000000000000000000000000000005rt1B
X-Hashcash:
1:25:051109:[email protected]::UzoZMFj7VUHCd1W/:00000000000000000000000000000012YxQ
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:06:53 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-CRM114-Score: -32.1219
X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: -32.1219 )
X-SA-Orig: -8.399, -32.1219
X-Spam-Value: -14.6279944444444
X-Grey: White
X-SA-Rep: -14.6279944444444 ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,HASHCASH_25
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang version 2.53 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
on 192.168.1.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi,
You know, the sheer ignorance displayed in this bug report is
staggering. Firstly, there is no upload to stable; all 10.X uploads
have been to experimental. Not a big deal, but it just evidence that
the reporter has no clue, and is simply reporting out of sheer ill
will and does not want to have this arguments get confused with
facts.
> As discussed on irc, the new 10.008 kernel-package was prematurely uploaded to
> unstable, and breaks linux-2.6 builds. The issues at hand are :
This is the first thing that happens not to be true.
> 1. the missing config caues manuals not to build
kernel-package has never been meant t function without a
.config file; all documentation stresses the need to have one in
place before calling make-kpkg. When presented with a case when
there is none, make-kpkg does its best to create a reasonable .config
file, as documented, and calls make oldconfig, to let the user answer
any options that are nwerer.
The older versions of make-kpkg had a bug, meaning that
sometimes it failed to look into . and ./debian; this bug is now
fixed.
The official process was taking advantage of this bug, and now
has to be fixed. Not a k-p bug.
> 2. the headers build binaries uneccessarily (but doesn't break build)
It is not at all clear that the build is unnecesary, as the
reporter well knows, since he was around when this was discussed on
IRC (or perhaps he was unable to follow technical discussions). It is
not clear whether the kernel headers are really fully correct, and
have all the things in script/ dir compiled, unless a full build is
done; hence building anyway is the safe route.
So this is either malice, or sheer technical incompetence, I
can't tell.
> 3. missing depends and recommends in the linux-image package.
At last report, the build succeeded on i386, and was being
retried on ppc,
> These are probably due to a k-p regression, which means that both
> the config for the arch-indep build and the control file provided by
> the linux-2.6 build infrastructure are not used for the final
> packages, for some yet mysterious reason.
Err, I believe it is not k-p regression, it is misusing k-p,
or using it in undocumented ways, when not hacking around k-p and
making assumptions about internal behaviour would work. There is a
problem, and something needs to be fixed -- but it is not clear that
that is kernel-package.
> This is being worked on, and hopefully a fix will be out soon, but
> in the meantime, kernel-package 10.008 is useless for official
> linux-2.6 builds, and since it is in unstable, means we cannot
> upload anymore linux-2.6 packages until it is fixed, which makes
> this RC.
To this point, the reporter has done nothing apart from troll,
insult, and hinder efforts to diagnose the issue, and this BTS abuse
is just another step in the process.
manoj
--
It is no the shortcomings of others, nor what others have done or not
done that one should think about, but what one has done or not done
oneself. 50
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
