On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org>wrote:

> On 16:27, Arturo Moral wrote:
> > # grep -i daily /var/log/syslog
> > Mar  8 11:27:51 raspi anacron[1920]: Job `cron.daily' terminated
>
> The log was probably rotated at that point.  Is there anythikng more of
> interest in the preceding log, e.g. syslog.1 or syslog.1.gz?
>

Here are all the "daily" occurrences inside syslog, syslog.1 and
syslog.2.gz:

Mar  4 21:25:01 raspi /USR/SBIN/CRON[20013]: (root) CMD (test -x
/usr/sbin/anacron || ( cd / && run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily ))
Mar  5 00:30:24 raspi anacron[1781]: Will run job `cron.daily' in 5 min.
Mar  5 10:16:35 raspi anacron[1781]: Job `cron.daily' started
Mar  5 10:16:36 raspi anacron[2631]: Updated timestamp for job `cron.daily'
to 2013-03-05
Mar  5 10:28:38 raspi anacron[1781]: Job `cron.daily' terminated
Mar  5 21:25:01 raspi /USR/SBIN/CRON[21063]: (root) CMD (test -x
/usr/sbin/anacron || ( cd / && run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily ))
Mar  6 21:25:01 raspi /USR/SBIN/CRON[23904]: (root) CMD (test -x
/usr/sbin/anacron || ( cd / && run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily ))
Mar  7 00:28:24 raspi anacron[1939]: Will run job `cron.daily' in 5 min.
Mar  7 12:47:32 raspi anacron[1939]: Job `cron.daily' started
Mar  7 12:47:32 raspi anacron[3205]: Updated timestamp for job `cron.daily'
to 2013-03-07
Mar  7 12:54:22 raspi anacron[1939]: Job `cron.daily' terminated
Mar  7 21:25:01 raspi /USR/SBIN/CRON[32538]: (root) CMD (test -x
/usr/sbin/anacron || ( cd / && run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily ))
Mar  8 00:10:23 raspi anacron[1920]: Will run job `cron.daily' in 5 min.
Mar  8 11:27:42 raspi anacron[1920]: Job `cron.daily' started
Mar  8 11:27:42 raspi anacron[4741]: Updated timestamp for job `cron.daily'
to 2013-03-08
Mar  8 11:27:51 raspi anacron[1920]: Job `cron.daily' terminated


>
> Thanks,
>

Thank you for your quick responses, Steven.

For me, everything seems to be working properly. I can't spot the problem.

Cheers.


> Regards,
> --
> Steven Chamberlain
> ste...@pyro.eu.org
>

Reply via email to