On 08.05.2013 11:44, gregor herrmann wrote: [...]
> I'm not so sure here. > It's possible to have the "old" libjgoodies-forms-java installed > (e.g. on a wheezy system) and then to install the "new" patched > mediathekview, which will most probably break. > > So I think a versioned dependency on libjgoodies-forms-java >= 1.6 > would indeed make sense for mediathekview. Well, that's true. I didn't think thoroughly enough about the "mixed distributions" case here because this is not a problem if you use pure sid or pure testing whereby version 1.6.0-3 of libjgoodies-forms-java enters before mediathekview. Indeed a versioned dependency on libjgoodies-forms-java makes sense in this case. I'd be glad if you could lend me a helping hand with MV again. I have prepared a new revision that contains only the versioned dependency change. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mediathekview/mediathekview_3.2.1+git20130327-2.dsc Regards, Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
