Control: tag -1 wheezy moreinfo Hi,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwama...@debian.org> (2013-10-07): > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > I'd like to propose an upgrade of opencv. > > opencv distributed in wheezy includes source code of non-free (#724920). > I want to solve this problem. > Source code of the target is the code for test. It does not affect the actual > working. > > I attached debdiff. Could you consider this change suitable for > stable-proposed-updates? (for the records, we usually prefer when bugs are fixed in testing / unstable before considering updates in stable.) Anyway, if the files indeed got relicensed under a suitable license, why should they get removed from an earlier release? At best we could ship a package with updated headers and licensing info to reflect the facts all those files are actually OK? Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
