Control: forcemerge -1 729249 Sekmadienis 17 Lapkritis 2013 17:56:12 Aurelien Jarno rašė: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 06:27:54PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: > > Control: reassign -1 libmtp-dev 1.1.6-20-g1b9f164-1 > > > > Hello, > > > > Ketvirtadienis 14 Lapkritis 2013 03:12:20 rašė: > > > Package: libgphoto2-2-dev > > > Version: 2.4.14-2.3 > > > Severity: serious > > > Tags: patch > > > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > > > Usertags: kfreebsd > > > Control: block 725951 by -1 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The recent change to the libusb dependency of libgphoto2-2-dev created > > > an odd problem on kfreebsd when trying to build gvfs: > > > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gvfs > > > > > > > gvfs build-depends on: > > > > - libgphoto2-2-dev (>= 2.4.0) > > > > libgphoto2-2-dev depends on: > > > > - libusb-1.0-0-dev | --virtual-libusb-1.0-0-dev > > > > gvfs build-depends on: > > > > - libmtp-dev (>= 1.1.0) > > > > libmtp-dev depends on: > > > > - libusb-dev > > > > libusb2-dev conflicts with: > > > > - libusb-dev > > > > > > kfreebsd has its own libusb-dev different from the implementations > > > available on linux. > > > > I wouldn't be so sure that libgphoto2 is the one which needs to be fixed. > > In my opinion, here libmtp-dev does the wrong thing. libusb-1.0 home > > page[1] says: > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- FreeBSD 8 and above include a FreeBSD-specific reimplementation of the > > libusb-1.0 API, so your applications will probably work there too. The > > source code for this library can be found here. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- > > > > Having in mind that libusb-0.1 is deprecated, it seems that the whole > > libusb* packaging structure (i.e. libusb-1.0-0-dev virtual package on > > kFreeBSD) in Debian is meant to establish that libusbx should be used on > > Linux while libusb2 from freebsd-libs should be used on kFreeBSD. I might > > be wrong so I'm also CC'ing libusbx and kFreeBSD maintainers. I will > > reassign the bug back to libgphoto2-2-dev if that's the case. > > This is exactly what I suggested in bug #729249.
Hello, ok, let's merge them then. -- Modestas Vainius <mo...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
