Hi, On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 02:16:01 +0000 peter green <plugw...@p10link.net> wrote: > I notice your patch is based on the experimental version of the package.
Ooh, I've not noticed it, thanks. > Afaict (note: i'm not the maintainer of this package) uploading a > package based on the experimental version to unstable would be a bad > idea without further coordination/planning as it would cause a > build-dependency conflict in guile-gnome-platform (I found this out the > hard way in raspbian). Yes, but as the patch suggested it would be put to experimental. And guile maintainer Rob suggested(*) those guile-depends-packages should move to guile 2.0 if we can. *) https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707901 etc. Probably maintainer put it to experimental once because Debian was around freeze time(*) (yes, just wild guess). *) https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/06/msg00009.html -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
