Le samedi 01 mars 2014 à 15:02 +0000, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo a écrit :
> I don't mind much to change to libsuperlu-dev. Is this future-proof, > for the foreseeable future? Or there are plans for the -dev be > versioned again in the near future? Moving to an unversioned -dev is precisely done to avoid sourceful uploads in future transitions. So it is definitely thought to be future-proof. > Also, k3d doesn't show up in the transitions page for superlu, and the > transition doesn't show up in K3D's PTS page :-? It's because your binary packages do not depend on the libsuperlu* packages. The tracker for the transition that was set up automatically does not look at the Build-Depends field, only at the Depends fields. Thanks for your help, -- .''`. Sébastien Villemot : :' : Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
