On 2014-03-17 08:32:21, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Package: avbin
> Severity: serious
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm wondering if this package is still actively maintained? I cannot
> help but noticing that the debian avbin package lacks several upstream
> versions behind, and has seen its latest maintainer upload almost 5
> years ago.
> 
> If the current maintainers think it would be best to let this package
> go, then I'd suggest to reassign this bug against ftp.debian.org and
> ask for its removal. Otherwise, I'd suggest to close this bug by
> uploading a new upstream version (and consider orphaning this
> package).
> 
> In any case, I'd suggest to remove avbin from testing for the time
> being to not hold up the libav10 transition further, which is file I
> file this bug with severity "serious".

Note that psychopy is the only reverse dependency of avbin:

% dak rm -Rn avbin
Will remove the following packages from unstable:

     avbin |      7-1.4 | source
libavbin-dev |      7-1.4 | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc
 libavbin0 |      7-1.4 | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, 
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc

Maintainer: Andrew Straw <straw...@astraw.com>

------------------- Reason -------------------

----------------------------------------------

Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Build-Depends:
psychopy: libavbin0

Dependency problem found.


CCing the psychopy maintainers for their input. If psychopy could drop
the build dependency on avbin, I think there is no reason to keep avbin
in Debian any longer.

Regards
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to