On 05/11/2014 09:16 PM, d...@debian.org wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:54:57PM -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: >> If this work was not done through the very public, very accessible Git repo >> that is used to manage the package then it has wasted your time and made >> mine harder as I've already been working on 1.10.1. So for wasting the time >> that I do have I thank you. > > if this DELAYED NMU could put pressure or somthing on you, i am really sorry. > if your working goes on, i will cancel my NMU. please tell me. >
https://github.com/jbouse-debian/paramiko/commits/master I've been working on 1.12.2 even though 1.14.0 is released as well but between 1.10 and 1.12 was fork, merge and change of upstream which has made the process as simple. Then complicated by still trying to get my new 4096 bit RSA key into the keyring and issues at work which have delayed my time to actually work on it. Attempt to help work within the packaging done within Git would have been much more helpful. As well I recall more than a couple tickets which looking through would have identified efforts being made before attempts to do a NMU without having first attempted contact with the maintainer of the package in question. I guess I expect more of Debian Developers but this seems to be a continuing trend those that have joined the project within the past 3-5 years now. I might suggest going back to the Developers Corner and re-reading the content... Maybe starting with https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
