Am 19.05.2014 21:00, schrieb Mark Wielaard: > On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 20:17 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> The sys/sdt.h header file is shipped in an architecture independent package, >> and >> installed into /usr/include where it is found on the include path for every >> architecture. [...] what about issues on architectures not supported by >> systemtap? > > Note that the sys/sdt.h header really is independent from systemtap. > When packages include sys/sdt.h they should get probes on any > architecture. These probes can then be used by any program supporting > SDT markers, like gdb, systemtap, perf, etc. It is just the package name > that refers to systemtap, but it could as well have been called > gdb-sdt-devel for example. In which case it should at least work as is > on any arch gdb supports.
I'm not complaing about the name of the package, but that it apparently *does* have some unintended effects on some architectures. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
