On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 09:58:26AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 09:11:52PM +1000, Riley wrote:
> > It has been found by posters on the gnu-linux-libre mailing list that some
> > files within u-boot contain code that is not in source form, violating 
> > DFSG2.
> > Please see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-
> > libre/2014-05/msg00014.html for a list of sourceless files found.
> 
> The files referenced in that email appear to be:
> 
> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xx/upatch.c
> board/dave/PPChameleonEVB/fpgadata.c
> board/esd/plu405/fpgadata.c
> board/esd/du405/fpgadata.c
> board/esd/cpci405/fpgadata_cpci4052.c
> board/esd/cpci405/fpgadata_cpci405ab.c
> board/esd/cpci405/fpgadata_cpci405.c
> board/esd/pci405/fpgadata.c
> board/esd/hh405/fpgadata.c
> board/esd/ar405/fpgadata.c
> board/esd/ar405/fpgadata_xl30.c
> board/esd/dasa_sim/fpgadata.c
> board/esd/voh405/fpgadata.c
> board/esd/apc405/fpgadata.c
> board/esd/tasreg/fpgadata.c
> board/esd/ash405/fpgadata.c
> board/esd/wuh405/fpgadata.c
> board/esd/cpciiser4/fpgadata.c
> board/sixnet/fpgadata.c
> board/netta/dsp.c
> drivers/dma/MCD_tasks.c
> 
> After a brief glance, I don't *think* any of the targets we ship use these
> files. They do appear to contain data that might be contstrued as sourceless
> firmware...

I've tested builds on armhf, armel, amd64 and powerpc, with these files
removed, and none of those builds failed... so it should be safe to remove
those files with a repackaged source tarball.


live well,
  vagrant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to