Your message dated Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:50:05 +0000
with message-id <e1x1uhr-0007q2...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#753226: fixed in lutefisk 1.0.7+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #753226,
regarding lutefisk: FTBFS: dpkg-source: error: expected ^--- in line 3 of diff 
`lutefisk-1.0.7+dfsg/debian/patches/build-flags'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
753226: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753226
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lutefisk
Version: 1.0.7+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> Unpack source
> ─────────────
> 
> gpgv: keyblock resource `/sbuild-nonexistent/.gnupg/trustedkeys.gpg': file 
> open error
> gpgv: Signature made Tue Jun  4 10:17:17 2013 UTC using DSA key ID C78F687C
> gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found
> dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on 
> ./lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-1.dsc
> dpkg-source: info: extracting lutefisk in lutefisk-1.0.7+dfsg
> dpkg-source: info: unpacking lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: info: unpacking lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: error: expected ^--- in line 3 of diff 
> `lutefisk-1.0.7+dfsg/debian/patches/build-flags'
> dpkg-source: info: applying build-flags
> dpkg-source: info: fuzz is not allowed when applying patches
> dpkg-source: info: if patch 'build-flags' is correctly applied by quilt, use 
> 'quilt refresh' to update it
> FAILED [dpkg-source died]

The full build log is available from:
   
http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2014/06/28/lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lutefisk
Source-Version: 1.0.7+dfsg-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lutefisk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 753...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Filippo Rusconi <lopi...@debian.org> (supplier of updated lutefisk package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:18:33 +0200
Source: lutefisk
Binary: lutefisk lutefisk-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.0.7+dfsg-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: The Debichem Group <debichem-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Filippo Rusconi <lopi...@debian.org>
Description:
 lutefisk   - de novo interpretation of peptide CID spectra
 lutefisk-doc - De novo interpretation of peptide CID spectra - documentation
Closes: 753226
Changes:
 lutefisk (1.0.7+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Force new version so that uploading will finally work. This time,
     upload after dpkg-buildpackage -sa, so that the orig.tar.gz is
     uploaded along with the other files. Indeed, the previous upload was
     rejected (can't really understand why):
 .
     lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-2.dsc: Invalid size hash for
     lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg.orig.tar.gz:
     According to the control file the size hash should be 270827,
     but lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg.orig.tar.gz has 268306.
 .
     If you did not include lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg.orig.tar.gz in you upload,
     a different version might already be known to the archive software.
 .
   * This release should still close that bug (Closes: #753226).
Checksums-Sha1:
 e721a0158eb9433173025119b68ad0899f58eaa2 2027 lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-3.dsc
 821a16ed285058abf4a09be7a8a028eb84553478 8892 
lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
 a1fa238d25380402b60b699befac183a1c1853f7 36404 
lutefisk-doc_1.0.7+dfsg-3_all.deb
 46c75a8e51917dc0e094539a469dcf49e8be5447 117262 lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-3_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 def9a0cc569e1027a8c6cdc8766fc797901b32aa27d2eb1a7aeb6fb4ed68d952 2027 
lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-3.dsc
 31d930a45f980090afadf1c75a78e28b8198c321dc9a79d3fa8158726c2a9037 8892 
lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
 e06e3495daecf2f1d985e1a7c7e5c308c95069f03e6705031dd184f69e131854 36404 
lutefisk-doc_1.0.7+dfsg-3_all.deb
 99a1c7b483bbc011b965243f52fb6501cb72f15b022ceae9afb22be3b2d833c5 117262 
lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-3_amd64.deb
Files:
 ea67342b9bb7b00b4722a85c56efa284 36404 doc optional 
lutefisk-doc_1.0.7+dfsg-3_all.deb
 4bdb5d6d4be5c5a95efbf6b8493b060f 117262 science optional 
lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-3_amd64.deb
 ba93c7ef052a6c7c05d91c5346fa1d46 2027 science optional 
lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-3.dsc
 a803fdf49c16a8df3274581aba00edba 8892 science optional 
lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=SnB5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to