Am 05.07.2014 18:21, schrieb Mark Wielaard: > Hi Matthias, > > On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 17:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> re-raising the severity of the issue, and preparing a NMU to move the >> header file to an architecture specific location. > > What is the issue you are seeing? I thought that what you saw was > something unrelated to sys/sdt.h. And as has been noted already the > header file really is arch independent. So the sdt-devel package really > should be arch:all as explained in bug #726248.
no, from my point of view no -dev package should be arch:all, but that's another discussion. > There have been bugs in the past, but they turned out to be bugs in > other packages and have been fixed. If there really are still bugs left > could you please describe them so they can also be fixed? could you tell me why you need the header on architectures that don't need it? I think that "it doesn't hurt" isn't good enough as an explanation. what is wrong with providing the header on architectures only where it is used? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
