On 30/07/2014 20:13, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Vincent > > On 30 July 2014 18:23, Vincent Danjean <vdanjean...@free.fr> wrote: >> As this bug remains me this situation, I'm proposing that we move >> the libOpenCL.so symlink into the dev package. [...] >> If you agree, we will have to go through all OpenCL packages to >> put correct conflicts/replaces where required. > > What changes would be required to all OpenCL packages if you moved the > libOpenCL.so symlink into the dev package? > > Surely if ocl-icd-libopencl1 ships libOpenCL.so then it should > conflict with all other opencl -dev packages (i.e. those that also > ship libOpenCL.so), and if it stops shipping libOpenCL.so then it is > just a matter of removing those conflicts?
all *-libopencl1 conflict/replace themselves as they provide the same binary (libOpenCL.so.1) And we need to put the correct conflict/replace for the libOpenCL.so. It is not hard but this file is (was?) not handled the same way by all OpenCL packagers. It is "just" a matter to list all packages (in wheezy and testing) that provide it. This will avoid to wait for users to detect missing conflict/replace and upload fixed packages. Regards Vincent > Regards > Graham > -- Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0xD17897FA vdanj...@debian.org GPG key fingerprint: 621E 3509 654D D77C 43F5 CA4A F6AE F2AF D178 97FA Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org