Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:02:23 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343408: fixed in ocaml-benchmark 0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2005 00:55:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 14 16:55:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org ([64.81.35.59] helo=renig.nat.blars.org)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EmhOs-0003ba-V6
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:55:15 -0800
Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
jBF0tC3l032041
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
        Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:55:12 -0800
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
        by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBF0wljR005279;
        Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:58:47 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBF0wlaB005277;
        Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:58:47 -0800
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:58:47 -0800
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ocaml-benchmark: ftbfs [sparc] ocamlfind: command not found
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: ocaml-benchmark
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source


ocaml-benchmark failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my
sparc buildd.  It also failed on all other buildds, and almost
certainly would fail on i386 if only the build dependancies were
installed.



ocamlc -a -o benchmark.cma  benchmark.cmo
ocamlfind remove benchmark; \
[ -f "benchmark.cmxa" ] && \
extra="benchmark.cmxa benchmark.a"; \
ocamlfind install -destdir 
/build/buildd/ocaml-benchmark-0.6/debian/libbenchmark-ocaml-dev///usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0
 benchmark \
benchmark.mli benchmark.cmi benchmark.cma META $extra 
/bin/sh: ocamlfind: command not found
/bin/sh: ocamlfind: command not found
make[1]: *** [install] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocaml-benchmark-0.6'
make: *** [install] Error 2

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 343408-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 23:12:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 15:12:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EoU1P-00010L-MF; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:02:23 -0800
From: Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#343408: fixed in ocaml-benchmark 0.6-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:02:23 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: ocaml-benchmark
Source-Version: 0.6-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ocaml-benchmark, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libbenchmark-ocaml-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/ocaml-benchmark/libbenchmark-ocaml-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb
ocaml-benchmark_0.6-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/ocaml-benchmark/ocaml-benchmark_0.6-2.diff.gz
ocaml-benchmark_0.6-2.dsc
  to pool/main/o/ocaml-benchmark/ocaml-benchmark_0.6-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ocaml-benchmark 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:57:29 +0100
Source: ocaml-benchmark
Binary: libbenchmark-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libbenchmark-ocaml-dev - OCaml benchmarking library
Closes: 343408
Changes: 
 ocaml-benchmark (0.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Forget to update control using control.in. Add dependency on ocaml-
     findlib (Closes: #343408)
Files: 
 665698852308881af78b0646a13a173a 659 libdevel optional 
ocaml-benchmark_0.6-2.dsc
 21dcedc7d960a339a51a414a34b1ffde 2739 libdevel optional 
ocaml-benchmark_0.6-2.diff.gz
 40040fecd0adba2b638e3f65e6446444 36980 libdevel optional 
libbenchmark-ocaml-dev_0.6-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDpzssir2bofsN/psRAgh9AJ9spL7dcAFMHWk02AiWzzzv0XiWKgCfYjOM
CGMoywEwF01MZh3ZfenR0Vw=
=8IRy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to