2014-08-22 2:55 GMT-05:00 Andreas Tille <andr...@fam-tille.de>: > Hi Luis,
Hi, Andreas. > I had another look into sitplus 1.1.0 upstream and it seems there is a > split between libsitplus and sitplus. From the download file layout > libsitplus looks similar to our packaged sitplus 1.0.3 and the upstream > sitplus-1.1.0 has a structure which I would consider "broken" > considering that the root of the source tree is featuring only the dir > /usr. Luis, you have spent some time into packaging sitplus but did not > responded to later pings. It would help if you could raise your voice > about your future plans with sitplus. If you stopped your engagement > I'm afraid we can not keep this software inside Debian which would be a > shame. My familiar situation has changed a lot since I packaged sitplus for the first time. I'm afraid I have very little free time, and I don't feel I can commit into maintaining this package anymore. I'm very sorry about that, and I would like to volunteer for this, but I just don't have the time. I'm CCing César Mauri, the upstream developer, just in case he wants to add something to the discussion. > I also noticed that upstream is providing packages targeting at Squeeze > which is lagging a behind current Debian development. Perhaps there is > some chance to join forces here with upstream to provide recent upstream > versions on recent Debian releases. However, if nobody volunteers for > this job I would ask ftpmaster for removal from Debian since I have > neither time nor the required background to test for this package. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. Regards. -- "If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning" -- Catherine Aird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org