Your message dated Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:23:20 +0000 with message-id <e1xotrw-0003oi...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#759897: fixed in ruby-backports 3.6.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #759897, regarding ruby-backports: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.1" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/testtask.rb:106:in `block (3 levels) in define': Command failed with status (1): [ruby -I"lib:lib:test" -I"/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby" "/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/rake_test_loader.rb" "test/**/*_test.rb" ] (RuntimeError) to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 759897: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=759897 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: ruby-backports Version: 3.6.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/testtask.rb:106:in `block (3 levels) in > define': Command failed with status (1): [ruby -I"lib:lib:test" > -I"/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby" > "/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/rake_test_loader.rb" "test/**/*_test.rb" ] > (RuntimeError) > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/file_utils.rb:45:in `call' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/file_utils.rb:45:in `sh' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/file_utils_ext.rb:37:in `sh' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/file_utils.rb:84:in `ruby' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/file_utils_ext.rb:37:in `ruby' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/testtask.rb:102:in `block (2 > levels) in define' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/file_utils_ext.rb:58:in `verbose' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/testtask.rb:98:in `block in define' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/task.rb:236:in `call' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/task.rb:236:in `block in execute' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/task.rb:231:in `each' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/task.rb:231:in `execute' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/task.rb:175:in `block in > invoke_with_call_chain' > from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/monitor.rb:211:in `mon_synchronize' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/task.rb:168:in > `invoke_with_call_chain' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/task.rb:161:in `invoke' > from debian/ruby-tests.rb:5:in `<main>' > ERROR: Test "ruby2.1" failed: The full build log is available from: http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2014/08/30/ruby-backports_3.6.0-1_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. The build was done with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="parallel=4", so if your packaging tries to support this, it might be a good idea to explore whether this might be the cause of the failure.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: ruby-backports Source-Version: 3.6.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ruby-backports, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 759...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jérémy Bobbio <lu...@debian.org> (supplier of updated ruby-backports package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:45:44 +0000 Source: ruby-backports Binary: ruby-backports Architecture: source all Version: 3.6.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Jérémy Bobbio <lu...@debian.org> Description: ruby-backports - backports of new features for older versions of Ruby Closes: 759897 Changes: ruby-backports (3.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Stop testing Rails support as it pulls incompatible dependencies. (Closes: #759897) Checksums-Sha1: be6639e6c7f8c495c7c4667639a25082db621992 2035 ruby-backports_3.6.0-2.dsc d807cadd9d4309c382cff2f8a2765afd4c75e33e 6790 ruby-backports_3.6.0-2.debian.tar.gz becc38ca6a476bb7b381e3db4f74d44b4c6688e4 69622 ruby-backports_3.6.0-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 68ceab5366988a5062a53bc087233a120bd8e2b44cda9d194764f40e027ae1db 2035 ruby-backports_3.6.0-2.dsc 516749733d4b09e9d874256717a238b42fcae0684ef453ed1747d9d43bc8d421 6790 ruby-backports_3.6.0-2.debian.tar.gz 0be98c82c592020b9dfc691516481b3c60bad104bad1d50ad3f16101e59bce9d 69622 ruby-backports_3.6.0-2_all.deb Files: a0796a5a72fccd658b9ae81493a85525 69622 ruby optional ruby-backports_3.6.0-2_all.deb be2856f103e4d39a7bd690898b4a939b 2035 ruby optional ruby-backports_3.6.0-2.dsc 3190176360b9c416abbf9c9581ca7627 6790 ruby optional ruby-backports_3.6.0-2.debian.tar.gz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUBIiBAAoJEEAsIlA9Nuk2nowP/1bLvMXj4G5xFCiGM/DChoHr KRZ05rd8eMUnYCRrkEp+ZAnencbf3Er/9gQSuVgV1mDcXlqaPiLJysVnk0+YbtQC oLVR4dJDvBi+X30omvZEF4jWAqcvmItMXNSaKtn8obJfs+Mmjb7mdPPk5p1VXDk+ Ffswp50Mdl+TswXAQ5qbmWVlx+7Yrq/ZLfTdm70eMpWgQtOKsjonbQYFgbjs2HX1 6vdij7bh2NYp0PthsTUgnh46Fu31AxpC9AYRn/bbFlVmhGjku6Typl4vwV7tOW19 GJ+kJ/rFvySefIorRX7Bb8xCpCqWex0pNr5N2GUWwD6VbZ13HqJ3nKF2YiZQZOC+ TgbOWOAPhsI4esdTwdnhInBhEMKZ6HBbre4iSzW5NLilIUt5HFE/6TH4bwvaqf6f OoBPNjLVtL7sDWmyY57Avqn4T/r6mLiJRg1GJPsoSdp5poOj7fZqCamlaIjxUODl nUiv9Dg9OuAX+H1cobhuuCm7mbnIkNz9Bztr6SA7P8S9Hi8UvZppCimiypS70fzb SGaZnZQYt978iiK52LEgCzmCknxRvke/+ewn3cKbD4WYeAdt/FSfOuYxQbHXBuuw BwmM8nQeIzBPBpXxi1/OnOhGWVmqi763mrZZaLBDgqu3n6CL8Z7++GWJ6tRqyOZ6 5F+VOUGf2MXMQhvCrpGR =jCBQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
