Your message dated Sat, 11 Oct 2014 11:48:58 +0000
with message-id <e1xcvaq-0005sn...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#763476: fixed in jpegjudge 0.0.2-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #763476,
regarding jpegjudge: Please change build dependency to libjpeg-dev 
(libjpeg-turbo transition)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
763476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763476
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jpegjudge
Version: 0.0.2-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: ond...@debian.org
Usertags: libjpeg-turbo-transition

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Dear maintainer(s),

Debian is transitioning from IJG JPEG library (src:libjpeg8) to
libjpeg-turbo implementation (src:libjpeg-turbo)[1] of libjpeg62 API
with "decode from memory buffer" interface (jpeg_mem_{src,dest}).

Your package cannot be transitioned automatically as it explicitly
build depends on specific API/ABI (libjpeg8-dev) and this build
dependency needs to be changed to libjpeg-dev.  In most if not all
cases this should be sufficient to build against libjpeg-turbo.

I am in process of testing each package in question to compile against
libjpeg-turbo and I will provide a suitable patch for each package
when I will succeed.

On the other hand please note that the winter^Wfreeze is coming and
if your package is not updated in due time it might be NMUed by the
release team (or by me with the full ack of release team).

That also means that if you are OK with NMU then please respond to
this bug report and I will prepare and upload the recompiled packages
for you.

Cheers,
Ondrej

1. The full Technical Committee decision can be found here:
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717076#235

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (700, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=HOLf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jpegjudge
Source-Version: 0.0.2-2.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jpegjudge, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 763...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ondřej Surý <ond...@debian.org> (supplier of updated jpegjudge package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:37:57 +0200
Source: jpegjudge
Binary: jpegjudge
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.0.2-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jari Aalto <jari.aa...@cante.net>
Changed-By: Ondřej Surý <ond...@debian.org>
Description:
 jpegjudge  - determine which of two given jpegs (same size) is the original
Closes: 763476
Changes:
 jpegjudge (0.0.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload
   * Change B-D to libjpeg-dev to finish the transition to libjpeg-turbo
     (Closes: #763476)
Checksums-Sha1:
 0ade4bf1b37a27c3bfb5d1c9b3587e265aaf823f 2023 jpegjudge_0.0.2-2.1.dsc
 32caf7b3a7f9c6e6a8bc15c156ac6245c07ae41d 8180 jpegjudge_0.0.2-2.1.debian.tar.xz
 bebda2351a72f3325758741763845cfa4cdd57c0 18220 jpegjudge_0.0.2-2.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 d800b7026c6d398feb091114ce58d10328f2a44b2db1f1b11dc99e8bc4582c3e 2023 
jpegjudge_0.0.2-2.1.dsc
 d53a55098839c3cf73591899430b7bd3ed2f14d7704f401c251a9d47b7b6afc5 8180 
jpegjudge_0.0.2-2.1.debian.tar.xz
 fd96c0febc13c855f792ea399095bef1bb9ca5ea170f70891d444364ab06453a 18220 
jpegjudge_0.0.2-2.1_amd64.deb
Files:
 c5a64a96e0e34919717973a3fc735aa6 18220 graphics optional 
jpegjudge_0.0.2-2.1_amd64.deb
 dca89dc4e8aac5911f370c9cc3824232 2023 graphics optional jpegjudge_0.0.2-2.1.dsc
 fc954151cea63cf0720abf181c87081e 8180 graphics optional 
jpegjudge_0.0.2-2.1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=DK2Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to