Control: tag -1 sid Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 14.10.2014, 15:46 +0000 schrieb Clint Adams: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 01:48:42PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Source: haskell-libtagc > > Version: 0.12.0-5 > > Severity: serious > > If pandoc is staying where it is, should this severity be > downgraded until after the release? yes, or better: assign the right tags to mark this as not relevant for jessie. (Tagging it "sid" is correct according to #debian-devel: <nomeata> I tend to get it wrong, hence: How do I mark an RC bug if it only affects the package in unstable, even if the versions are the same in unstable and testing? <christoph> tag it sid I guess <jcristau> usually you don't do that <jcristau> because then whatever makes it not apply to jessie migrates, and then the bug state is wrong <nomeata> The bug in question is http://bugs.debian.org/762442, and there is no danger of accidential migration to jessie <nomeata> It could be argued that it is not RC yet <jcristau> yes, it could <dondelelcaro> it also might be a candidate for jessie-ignore; but it's probably OK the way it is <jcristau> after the release when you make it rc you can tag it sid and $jessie+1 ) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part