On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:49:24 Dan Mick wrote: > >> It is serious because it is a violation of Policy ยง3.3. > > Further: please quote me the provision of 3.3 that this mailing list > setup violates.
I think he meant to refer to the following:
The maintainer must be specified in the Maintainer control field with
their correct name and a working email address. The email address given
in
the Maintainer control field must accept mail from those role accounts
in
Debian used to send automated mails regarding the package. This includes
non-spam mail from the bug-tracking system, all mail from the Debian
archive maintenance software, and other role accounts or automated
processes that are commonly agreed on by the project.[7] If one person
or
team maintains several packages, they should use the same form of their
name and email address in the Maintainer fields of those packages.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-maintainer
I fail to see how it is in conflict with moderated list but I will not object
if someone considers switching mail list back to non-moderated.
Clint, please don't you worry, I see your bug reports just fine.
--
Cheers,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something,
sometime in your life.
-- Victor Hugo, "Villemain", 1845
(often misattributed to Winston Churchill)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
