On 24 Nov 2014 13:39, "jpff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would prefer a simpe renaming, despite the pain of completions in the shell. > I do not think we guarantee scripts, just API and csd/orc/sco files. > ==John
If the renaming is done upstream, we probably can pick a better name than csound_cs :). The purpose of the util is to run csound, so possibly csrun is a better name? Similarly, I could rename csound_extract to csextract. Saludos, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
