Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:24 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341677: fixed in anjuta 1.2.4a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 05:49:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 01 21:49:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Ei3nE-0007Q3-DC
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:49:12 -0800
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-106-110.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.106.110])
        by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
jB25n8Fe029751;
        Fri, 2 Dec 2005 00:49:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1Ei3nA-000588-RZ; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:49:08 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: anjuta: bogus dependency on libfreetype6
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:49:08 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: anjuta
Severity: grave

Please note that anjuta is one of the packages with an apparently
spurious dependency on libfreetype6.  This should probably be
fixed at the same time as #339146.

You should be able to lose quite a lot of dependencies actually, as this looks
like it's suffering rather badly from recursive library dependency disease.

Please see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00016.html
for some information on the library dependency problem.

This bug is 'preemptively grave' because it will become grave if there
is a freetype6 transition, and there probably will be.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341677-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2006 22:33:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 14:33:27 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Evj5M-0007vw-TD; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:24 -0800
From: Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#341677: fixed in anjuta 1.2.4a-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:32:24 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: anjuta
Source-Version: 1.2.4a-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
anjuta, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

anjuta-common_1.2.4a-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta-common_1.2.4a-1_all.deb
anjuta_1.2.4a-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-1.diff.gz
anjuta_1.2.4a-1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-1.dsc
anjuta_1.2.4a-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-1_i386.deb
anjuta_1.2.4a.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated anjuta package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  8 Jan 2006 19:51:10 +0000
Source: anjuta
Binary: anjuta anjuta-common
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.2.4a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 anjuta     - A GNOME development IDE, for C/C++
 anjuta-common - Data files for Anjuta
Closes: 341677
Changes: 
 anjuta (1.2.4a-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Fixes from Steve Langasek:
   - Re-libtoolize the package to eliminate spurious library dependencies
     (closes: #341677).
   - Trim a few unnecessary library references from configure.in and
     launcher/Makefile.am.
Files: 
 70094d3b299204a2a1269e087c89855c 765 gnome optional anjuta_1.2.4a-1.dsc
 7e6af289b4bfd1ec2ca72e2017efc4d3 7413278 gnome optional 
anjuta_1.2.4a.orig.tar.gz
 5e5aaf33e6d08e1b71ef0edff9803456 70958 gnome optional anjuta_1.2.4a-1.diff.gz
 403e05122f081259ae1f126bb34feb48 5883764 devel optional 
anjuta-common_1.2.4a-1_all.deb
 3ad3768ad1a064b0a2c1414c99562ff7 938356 gnome optional anjuta_1.2.4a-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDwXrPCw8pKd+B7oMRAr2VAKCRLGDdIY3YzPQ+yuFyfQ5N0GzuCQCgpmCu
DXccb1w2iVvNeMcOyTGW11g=
=uy3J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to