Your message dated Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:21:30 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347086: rgl: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:41:44 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:41:44 2006 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzd-0000rR-0b for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:42 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz6-0006tp-OC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:08 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rgl: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:08 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: rgl Version: 0.65-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --------------------------------------- Received: (at 347086-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 03:22:02 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 19:22:02 2006 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.85]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evnbe-0004jx-Bd for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:22:02 -0800 Received: from basebud.nulle.part (c-67-174-11-185.hsd1.il.comcast.net[67.174.11.185]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2006010903213101400q8usee>; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 03:21:31 +0000 Received: from edd by basebud.nulle.part with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1Evnb8-0006CF-5W; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:21:30 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:21:30 -0600 To: Adeodato =?UTF-8?Q?Sim=C3=B3?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#347086: rgl: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 On 9 January 2006 at 02:38, Adeodato Sim=F3 wrote: | Package: rgl | Version: 0.65-1 | Severity: serious Fixed in 0.65-2 but I have heard so far only from the queue processor, = not the installer: From: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Processing of rgl_0.65-2_i386.changes Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:26:44 -0800 Dirk --=20 Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.=20= -- Thomas A. Edison -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]