Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2015 10:42:13 +0200
with message-id <1434184933.1624.0.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#736440:
[src:haskell-criterion] Sourceless file
has caused the Debian Bug report #736440,
regarding [src:haskell-criterion] Some sources are not included in your package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
736440: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736440
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: haskell-criterion
Version: 0.6.2.0-3
user: lintian-ma...@debian.org
usertags: source-is-missing
severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org
Hi,
Your package seems to include some files that lack sources
in prefered forms of modification:
templates/js/excanvas-r3.min.js
templates/js/jquery-1.6.4.min.js
templates/js/jquery.flot-0.7.min.js
This is against the Debian Free Software Guidelines [1] (DFSG) #2:
"The program must include source code, and must allow distribution
in source code as well as compiled form.".
In order to solve this problem, you could:
1. repack the origin tarball adding the missing source to it.
2 add the source files to "debian/missing-sources" directory
Both way satisfies the requirement that we ship the source. Second option
might be preferable due to the following reasons [2]:
- Upstream can do it too and you could even supply a patch to them, thus full
filling our social contract [3], see particularly ยง2.
- If source and non-source are in different locations, ftpmasters may
miss the source and (needlessly) reject the package.
- The source isn't duplicated in every .diff.gz/.debian.tar.* (though
this only really matters for larger sources).
You could also ask debian...@lists.debian.org or #debian-qa for more
guidance.
[1] https://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html#guidelines
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736873#8
[3] https://www.debian.org/social_contract
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.1.0.0-1
Am Samstag, den 13.06.2015, 03:23 +0100 schrieb peter green:
> According to Joachim's comment on the upstream bug this was fixed in
> 1.0.0.0 . Should this be marked as fixed in version 1.0.0.0-1 in Debian?
there is no 1.0.0.0-1 in Debian, but otherwise, you are right. Thanks!
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F
JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
