On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 09:00:34PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:12:51PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Package: perl-modules-5.22 > > Version: 5.22.0-1 > > Severity: important > > Affects: autopkgtest > > > > During test rebuilds, I noticed (via autopkgtest, which uses apt-get > > downloads on this module as part of the test suite) an odd effect with > > libtest-tester-perl. This (and libtest-use-ok-perl) are now virtual > > packages, as they have been folded into both perl and libtest-simple-perl. > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > libtest-simple-perl : Breaks: libtest-tester-perl > > perl-modules-5.22 : Breaks: libtest-tester-perl (< 0.114) > > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused > > by held packages. > > > > I think the solution is probably to have perl-modules-5.22 > > Provides libtest-tester-perl (et al) (in other words revert > > 5da2d5650164e49a400bec6c304f7e6bc0c98411) but I'd welcome other > > thoughts. > > Yes, I suppose perl (from 5.22) and libtest-simple-perl need to agree on > whether they Provide libtest-tester-perl and libtest-use-ok-perl. Either > both should or both should not. As libtest-simple-perl went for the > Provides so should we.
Hm, testing this indicates it's not enough. It looks like the libtest-simple-perl Breaks (and presumably Replaces too) need to be versioned, otherwise they also affect the virtual packages provided by perl. Will test this locally later. -- Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
