On Jul 19 2015, Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> wrote:
>     Nikolaus> I agree. There shouldn't have been an s3ql package in
>     Nikolaus> Wheezy. This was when I was young and inexperienced with
>     Nikolaus> Debian packaging. However, the situation is different for
>     Nikolaus> Jessie. Now that it is much more mature, there will be
>     Nikolaus> issues in keeping the stretch S3QL fully backwards
>     Nikolaus> compatible with Jessie S3QL.
>
> I don't understand.
> do you mean perhaps no issues or a managable number of issues or
> something like that?

I meant to write "no issues", sorry.

>     >> So, you talked about it being a lot of work to do the upgrade in
>     >> one step.  Why does that need to happen?  Why can't the upgrade
>     >> be handled in two steps and we just package the necessary parts
>     >> to do all the steps?
>
>     Nikolaus> That would mean to package ~5 intermediate S3QL
>     Nikolaus> versions. Not a big deal in terms of work (since these
>     Nikolaus> versions were already in testing at some point), but do
>     Nikolaus> you think that would be acceptable for a point release?
>
>     >> How much harder are we talking about than getting the s3qladm and
>     >> s3ql libraries from the 2.5 version of s3ql into Jessie?
>
>     Nikolaus> I don't understand the question.
>
> Ah.
> Looking at the debian news file, the only announced upgrade is  at
> version 2.5 between 1.11 and 2.11.1.

Oh. Obviously my memory has failed me completely here. You are right. I
just checked, all that is needed is one interim version. The best choice
would be to package S3QL 2.9, that is the most-recent version that still
supports upgrading from 1.11.

> It sounds like you believe that many intermediate versions are
> required.  What am I missing?  It looks to me like only one
> intermediate version is needed.  Can we get that into Jessie?  I don't
> know, but I'd be happy to talk to the release team and make my best
> argument for it.

I you can get the release team to agree, I'm happy to get the package in
shape. This would be based on

http://snapshot.debian.org/package/s3ql/2.9%2Bdfsg-2/


Best,
-Nikolaus

-- 
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F

             »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to