Control: severity -1 normal On 08/02/2015 01:33 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > 2015-08-01 22:36 GMT+01:00 Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org>: >> reopen 791165 >> severity 791165 serious >> tags 791165 + confirmed >> retitle 791165 libsdl-sge: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the >> default >> thanks >> >> this is exactly what you should *not* do: >> >> libsdl-sge (030809dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium >> . >> * Bump Policy Standars-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) >> * Rebuild against GCC-5 (Closes: #791165) >> * Enable parallel compilation with dh >> * Fix mispelling in d/copyright (detected by lintian) >> >> Please rename the library package (and add a proper library version). > > Why not? I already explained in the bug report why IMO we don't need a > transition: > > - no packages in Debian use the functions
sorry, didn't see this. please could you mention this with your next upload in the changelog and then close the issue? > In addition: > > - supertransball2 is going to be NMUd in the libstdc++ transition anyway > > - ruby-sdl has 200 reported installations in popcon, supertransball > 129, infon-viewer 20 (the risk of breakage is not high, and it's in > very unimportant packages) > > - it looks to me that RT are not very happy with unnecessary / > gratuitous transitions [1], which to me it reads as if they can avoid > them unless really needed > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/07/msg00333.html > > > Cheers. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
