On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:42:00PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello Steve, > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:32:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:45:55PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > Hello Steve, > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:07:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > Does this bug actually apply to unstable or testing, where we do have > > > > both > > > > gtk+ 2.6 and libglade 2.5? Is anything required here other than a > > > > rebuild > > > > against current unstable?
> > > (Sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation and just returned) > > > I definitly applies to stable and it probably applies to unstable as > > > well. According to upstream[1], a rebuild (against current unstable) > > > should be > > > sufficient. If you want, I can check this in the next days. > > Yes, please check it and I can schedule binNMUs for the issue. > Ok, I just checked in a up-to-date sid changeroot and a simple rebuild > is sufficient to solve this issue[0]. > [0] Please do not close #319713 but retitle it and ask for tighter > (build-)dependencies (which would no longer be RC, of course). Well, in that case I think it would be best to just upload (NMU or otherwise) to fix the build-deps. > On the other hand, the latest upstream version (0.9.93) builds fine as > well[1]. It most likly closes all goobox-bugs except #291567. Right now, > goobox has trouble accessing my CD-ROM from within my changeroot, so I > cannot fully test #319719. If you think it is worthwile, I can prepare > a QA-upload with the new upstream and orphaning goobox. > Tell me if you think such a QA-Upload would be sensible[3]. > [3] If you prefer, I can also ask Martin Michlmayr who sponsors other > packages of mine if he thinks a QA upload should be prepared with > the new upstream version. We evidently haven't heard anything from Dan yet on this RC bug, so orphaning may be appropriate -- but he has three other packages in unstable, so if he's MIA, MIA/QA should be notified first to figure out if all four packages should be orphaned. If goobox is orphaned, is it your intention to adopt it? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
