Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:47:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346889: fixed in wmfsm 0.34-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:46 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:46 2006 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzl-0000vX-FY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:49 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1EvlzO-0006yj-Ks for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:26 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wmfsm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:26 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wmfsm Version: 0.34-8 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --------------------------------------- Received: (at 346889-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 14:50:45 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 06:50:45 2006 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ExmgX-0006TR-MJ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:47:17 -0800 From: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346889: fixed in wmfsm 0.34-10 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:47:17 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: wmfsm Source-Version: 0.34-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of wmfsm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: wmfsm_0.34-10.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wmfsm/wmfsm_0.34-10.diff.gz wmfsm_0.34-10.dsc to pool/main/w/wmfsm/wmfsm_0.34-10.dsc wmfsm_0.34-10_i386.deb to pool/main/w/wmfsm/wmfsm_0.34-10_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated wmfsm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:40:46 +0100 Source: wmfsm Binary: wmfsm Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.34-10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: wmfsm - WindowMaker dock app for monitoring filesystem usage Closes: 346889 347639 Changes: wmfsm (0.34-10) unstable; urgency=low . * configure: rebuild with autoconf 2.59a-7 to fix tests for X11 libraries, closes: #347639, #346889 Files: ccea2e54732c73df18368d24f726d8a6 613 utils optional wmfsm_0.34-10.dsc b5d0b4042985cbea93334da5d6579448 53134 utils optional wmfsm_0.34-10.diff.gz ed11beec0a8a9c92b683db6614960f97 15604 utils optional wmfsm_0.34-10_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyQ3KNgpsykSg/LgRA8mpAJ0S+CJxtwg7M8XxH4JmW8wqNW0qSwCfS27W YGILczX+kkaAkAAdb1/xqBM= =bCIB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]