Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:49:17 +0000
with message-id <e1zx8pd-000576...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#797257: fixed in ruby-rack-protection 1.5.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #797257,
regarding ruby-rack-protection: FTBFS: `block in expect_with': :stdlib is not 
supported (ArgumentError)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
797257: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797257
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-rack-protection
Version: 1.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Tags: sid stretch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

The package fails to build:

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Run tests for ruby2.1 from debian/ruby-tests.rake                            │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

RUBYLIB=/ruby-rack-protection-1.5.2/debian/ruby-rack-protection/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby:.
 rake2.1 -f debian/ruby-tests.rake
/usr/bin/ruby2.1 /usr/bin/rspec --pattern spec/\*\*\{,/\*/\*\*\}/\*_spec.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/configuration.rb:656:in `block in 
expect_with': :stdlib is not supported (ArgumentError)
        from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/configuration.rb:635:in `map'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/configuration.rb:635:in 
`expect_with'
        from /ruby-rack-protection-1.5.2/spec/spec_helper.rb:96:in `block in 
<top (required)>'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core.rb:97:in `configure'
        from /ruby-rack-protection-1.5.2/spec/spec_helper.rb:95:in `<top 
(required)>'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in 
`require'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in 
`require'
        from /ruby-rack-protection-1.5.2/spec/authenticity_token_spec.rb:1:in 
`<top (required)>'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/configuration.rb:1327:in 
`load'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/configuration.rb:1327:in 
`block in load_spec_files'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/configuration.rb:1325:in 
`each'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/configuration.rb:1325:in 
`load_spec_files'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/runner.rb:103:in `setup'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/runner.rb:89:in `run'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/runner.rb:74:in `run'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/runner.rb:42:in `invoke'
        from /usr/bin/rspec:4:in `<main>'
/usr/bin/ruby2.1 /usr/bin/rspec --pattern spec/\*\*\{,/\*/\*\*\}/\*_spec.rb 
failed
ERROR: Test "ruby2.1" failed. Exiting.

Full build log:
https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ruby-rack-protection.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-rack-protection
Source-Version: 1.5.3-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-rack-protection, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 797...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Balasankar C <balasank...@autistici.org> (supplier of updated 
ruby-rack-protection package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 18:02:49 +0530
Source: ruby-rack-protection
Binary: ruby-rack-protection
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers 
<pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Balasankar C <balasank...@autistici.org>
Description:
 ruby-rack-protection - Protects against typical web attacks for Rack apps
Closes: 797257
Changes:
 ruby-rack-protection (1.5.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Port tests partially to RSpec3 and make them run (Closes: #797257)
Checksums-Sha1:
 f5add74a59dcb729cdb57a5f74b311a7a07e519f 2147 ruby-rack-protection_1.5.3-2.dsc
 a1ee8050e8d1701454082640b2f0900e75d10272 6684 
ruby-rack-protection_1.5.3-2.debian.tar.xz
 b6a5f09538c825b7f7aeffd2855f6cb2ba5d9047 10070 
ruby-rack-protection_1.5.3-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 dce0c0b062a8864cbd8005da283c9eb314f04c4d6d76c73a8e4657fe2afca5f0 2147 
ruby-rack-protection_1.5.3-2.dsc
 609e00bc2ac55ff0b19e7985678dc1fff6427313d5f9979d647cc1816b3d9ed8 6684 
ruby-rack-protection_1.5.3-2.debian.tar.xz
 8d89e88753f5d1426f0aef72bf0be39f10c50c0d7da2398edb51788229299804 10070 
ruby-rack-protection_1.5.3-2_all.deb
Files:
 a6b5f40ec69aaf75ef722ad239993313 2147 ruby optional 
ruby-rack-protection_1.5.3-2.dsc
 9061fdd5acd4fcbf055407dd09c837d0 6684 ruby optional 
ruby-rack-protection_1.5.3-2.debian.tar.xz
 9f689f58480882d21313e74191ef07dc 10070 ruby optional 
ruby-rack-protection_1.5.3-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=OQ6G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to