On Sun, 06 Sep 2015 13:37:44 +0200 Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:11:14 +1000 Riley Baird > <bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch> wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:54:00 -0400 > > Eric Dorland <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > * Riley Baird (bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch) wrote: > > > > This is listed in the FTP master's cruft report, so if I'm correct, it > > > > shouldn't be necessary to request a removal from unstable. > > > > > > Yeah and you have the right conflicts/replaces. I'm surprised it's > > > complaining about this. > > > > No, at the moment, it is possible to simultaneously install these > > conflicting packages because someone made a NMU just before or after you > > uploaded my package, but they didn't add the hyphen between "libassa" > > and "3", so now we have libassa3.5-5v5 and libassa-3.5-5v5. > What is the status on adding these Conflicts/Replaces? This bug will > soon be the only thing blocking libassa's transition to testing. We don't need to add any more Conflicts/Replaces. libassa3.5-5v5 and libassa-3.5-5v5 both only exist in unstable at the moment. They come from different versions of the same source package. Only libassa-3.5-5v5 will make it into testing. For a person running testing, it will be impossible to have the problem which Ralf described.
pgpVHi1Vc_vpd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
