On 2015-09-18 11:36, "David Prévot" wrote: >> Package: ampache > > You’re not even looking at the right package, and no: > > Package: ampache-common
Oops ... right, that tells a different story. At least this "workaround" seems to have worked in the past. I don't mind doing rebuild-only QA uploads (since arch:all cannot be binNMUed), but I don't care about (or even use) ampache at all. > The next transition of any of these dependencies will be blocked by this > unmaintained and out of date ampache package. Keeping it in the archive as > is is considered harmful. Please retitle the bug according to your wishes, right now it just calls for a rebuild. Andreas