On 2015-10-23 18:10, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015, at 11:13, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > > > Should this patch be backported both to stable and unstable? > > It needs to go to stable sooner than later, yes. But it seems wise to > let it cook in unstable/testing for a bit, first.
The patch is already committed to our stable branch: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-glibc?view=revision&revision=6644 The plan is to upload it to stable-proposed-updates once we have more fixes in (mostly the nscd bugs) or we are getting close to the next point release. > I don't know what the plans for uploading new glibc to unstable are. The plan is to get glibc 2.21 to unstable soon. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
