Your message dated Fri, 27 Nov 2015 21:52:29 +0100
with message-id <5658c28d.7030...@googlemail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#800509: LLVM default to 3.6 transition ?
has caused the Debian Bug report #804852,
regarding Does not support current clang version: 3.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
804852: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804852
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: afl-clang
Severity: minor
The current clang version in unstable is at 3.6, but afl-clang does not support
it. If the clang minor version is important, can you depend on clang-3.5
explicitly instead, in order to allow to multiple co-installable versions?
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (800, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.94b-1+b1
On 24.11.2015 17:46, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 22/11/15 23:26, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> Dear release team,
>>
>> afl-clang is also involved in this transition, as it depends on:
>> clang (<< 1:3.6), clang (>= 1:3.5)
>>
>> Hence it is currently uninstallable in sid, which was reported as #804852.
>
> Thanks for catching that. I have updated the transition tracker to catch those
> kind of dependencies.
>
>> After a no-change-rebuild in current sid, these dependencies change to:
>> clang (<< 1:3.7), clang (>= 1:3.6)
>>
>> So please schedule a binNMU for afl to make it installable again.
>
> Scheduled.
Thanks, I'm closing #804852 now, as afl-clang is now installable again.
Best regards,
Andreas
--- End Message ---
