Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:02:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346684: fixed in fspanel 0.7-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:37 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:36 2006 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvlzX-0000nm-Fd for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:36 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz1-0006lq-96 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:03 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fspanel: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:03 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: fspanel Version: 0.7-5 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --------------------------------------- Received: (at 346684-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2006 19:11:18 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 18 11:11:18 2006 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EzIZP-0003AO-8f; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:02:11 -0800 From: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346684: fixed in fspanel 0.7-6 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:02:11 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: fspanel Source-Version: 0.7-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fspanel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fspanel_0.7-6.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fspanel/fspanel_0.7-6.diff.gz fspanel_0.7-6.dsc to pool/main/f/fspanel/fspanel_0.7-6.dsc fspanel_0.7-6_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fspanel/fspanel_0.7-6_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated fspanel package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:42:05 +0000 Source: fspanel Binary: fspanel Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: fspanel - minimalist panel for X Closes: 346684 Changes: fspanel (0.7-6) unstable; urgency=low . * Bah. I'd hoped to keep the same version in etch as in sarge. * Update build-deps to reflect the xlibs bitrot (closes: #346684) * May as well update to policy 3.6.2, since there's no changes needed * Squish a few compiler warnings while we're here, no substantive changes * ...and a couple of lintian ones * And translate the manpage into English Files: dd7aad7f8b81aa735c9bf004a6accab3 578 x11 optional fspanel_0.7-6.dsc b033b27b68c0bb86f4cbf7cc4cd84f66 3836 x11 optional fspanel_0.7-6.diff.gz 295c2e8586694be9b24bcdab6435d032 11642 x11 optional fspanel_0.7-6_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDzo59lpK98RSteX8RAth1AJ4o8x/CMDTRvUgjBlalWQvsKVy+8ACfeN8I sbP15zlSHjXdCPUJJESfQ0o= =NTBG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]