On 2016-01-19 Doug Torrance <dtorra...@piedmont.edu> wrote: > On 01/19/2016 02:41 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >> 2a Patch the source to fix back the symbol versioning to >> LIBWRASTER3 [...] > Option 2a sounds good to me. Feel free to revert my last few commits if you > get to it before I do.
Thanks for preparing for my commit in advance. How about opening a experimental branch for the package split, to spare us the commit/revert cycle if we find another urgent issue? > Just to clarify, would the best course of action for upstream to be to go > ahead and bump the soname for libwraster to 6 for the next release? If so, I > can prepare a patch. I think 2a is also the best option for upstream, not a soname bump. Perhaps a timely 0.95.7.1 issue? BTW: Do you have admin privileges for the pkg-wmaker-devel list? If so would you mind disabling addition of a the [Pkg-wmaker-devel] tag to the subject? cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'